Google
 

By Paul Helbert - Broadway, Virginia - USA. Comment by Michael Storer, Designer - Australia



Here is my "William Henry Harrison", a non published prototype, narrow version of Michael Storer's Quick Canoe. Michael's idea was to test stability and some other issues in a narrower boat. Sailing it was my idea; it surprised us both by sailing pretty well. It has no rudder. All steering is done by weight shift, heeling, sail trim or use of the paddle.

The canoe is made from thirty dollars worth of 4.5mm underlayment, twenty dollars hardwood for gunwales and thwarts, and about forty dollars worth of epoxy and miscellaneous. I had already built the sail rig (also Michael Storer's design) for another canoe so it is not counted in the cost. It probably added another forty dollars because although I used a two dollar polytarp, I did use good cordage and fittings. The balanced lug sail is two square meters, with one set of reef points.

My "big boat" is a PDR. I find myself using the canoe often when I only have a few hours after work, or don't want to have to load the bigger boat onto the roof racks.

I have attached a few photos and here are some links to video clips on the web:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPFkaRBAM18

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE4UvCZIgOY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQxxj9W5Grg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsS3Z5MfJuA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cxbvwcqja1w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgTTqAWq_Ks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaHiCN7tG5Y

All the hardware is from Duckworks.

Finally, the William Henry Harrison joke is on me since she did not turn out to be as tippy as she looked before trying her out.

MIK does not plan to release plans for this version and I think he wants that to be made clear. (He has added comments to that effect on some of the video clips on youtube). This boat was very much experimental and we have had a number of surprises (and discovered a few problem areas) from it, which was its reason for being. IDEAS from what was and is being learned will, no doubt, be incorporated it future efforts. Anything you can add (to the splash) to help with that understanding, the better.

I am planning to take the boat to the CLC OcoumeFest mid May, mostly to show the $1000 crowd what $100 can do. Maybe they won't care. Maybe I'll see some good ideas to steal.

****

FIRST SAIL - Too much wind.

I have no photos to show for a long day (mostly driving). The wind at Mount Storm was higher than forecast and although I had added reef grommets on the leach and luff, I could not figure how to use them properly. I tried to set it up reefed to begin with, but the sail bagged and stayed loose bellied. I could not get the down haul to work properly with the reefing. I need to learn how to do that.

So, I decided to go with the full sail. Not a good idea as the wind was fierce. I was on a lee shore about 30 degrees to the wind, if that makes any sense. Could not go to starboard because the land was there. So I took off FAST to port on a reach which had me heading toward the lake's center in breaking waves and my port gunwale almost in the water. I was still sorting things out... couldn't get the paddle out from under thwarts, so turned downwind and back toward shore. I crashed into the shore hard enough to rag-doll myself on the center thwart and cut my knee on the sharp corner of the mast step which needs to be eased. Made shore about a tenth of a mile down wind of the launch and waded back along shore pulling the boat.

The wind continued to freshen and as I was alone at the lake, I packed up. Stopped at a little fishing lake on the way home. There the wind was much less as it was blocked by some hills and often dies down in the late afternoon. In those gentler breezes I had a good sail. (Would have first tried it in such a place but had chosen Mount Storm due to the warmer water). I had the boat under control and spent a couple of hours going wherever I wanted and made it back to the rather unlikely windward launch site in front of an admiring small crowd of fishermen.

Great fun but also great exercise in that it is an almost constant balancing act. Anytime I would lean back to look up at my telltale, the boat would react to my motion in one way or another. Weight shift steering worked better than with my (much beamier (35" vs this 28",
22" at chines)) canoe, but I also found myself using the paddle more often... probably just getting used to it. I think the hard chines were helping with the steering in that they cut in better than the smooth rounded chines that I am familiar with. Once the helm is balanced by weight and leeboard, a slight lean to one side initiates a gentle turn to the other. Of course with so little freeboard this method has risks and keeping the boat level is interesting and half the fun. I heard a bit of wave slap but could not determine my fore and aft trim and had nobody to take pictures.

The overall stiffness of this little boat is outstanding. It is also tough. Two ounce glass on the bottom, 2" glass wraps the chines and stems externally and 1" glass beefs up the chines internally.

I solicit your suggestions as to how to properly do the reefing and have a decent sail shape.

The adjustable bracket used on this (and my previous) canoe seems to be a good measuring device or template. I think once I have it set, a lighter, made to fit, version will be made and in the case of the QC, perhaps glued and screwed in place... not sure that is a good idea, though, because when I hit the bank at Mount Storm, there were two "safety features" in play: My light string leeboard hold-down and the clamps along the gunwales both shifted and helped protect against any damage.

More testing coming soon. Have to work today and then we may be returning to more seasonable (cooler temperatures). Also am pondering the addition of a rudder for sailing.

****

TWO WEEKS LATER AFTER A FEW MODERATE WIND SAILS

The boat really is a hoot! The little drop-in sail fits it well. It might be able to handle a bit more sail but this is great for learning and quite enough for now. I have pretty much gotten over the twitchy feel. I describe it as like riding a bicycle, which it is in more ways than one: Like a bike, it takes a bit of time to get the feel. Once the feel is obtained it becomes a dynamic activity which takes almost no conscious thought but rather just a set of conditioned responses... reactions to conditions as they occur.

I fully expect to get dumped sooner or later and I do go prepared for that. I intentionally jibed several times Sunday without problem but otherwise did my turns to windward. I may be sitting a bit too far aft in the video clip. It should not be much problem to adjust helm with different trim. Please let me know what you think about that.

In departure from the design, I do not plan to install permanent seat(s). The bean bag works fine for fishing or pfutzing around on the lake. Keeping an open bottom for scooting my butt around seems best for sailing. Originally I had the center thwart aft eight or ten inches for kneeling, but moved it to the center in order to have advantage of the extra thicknesses of the buttstrap for screw head holding as well as to obtain good balance while carrying. This canoe will also be used almost exclusively on lakes, ponds or sections of rivers where no rocks are expected. Yes, I'll do some more testing on some creeks and minor rapids, but due to the thin ply construction and its sharp chines, I cannot expect it to come home unscathed from whitewater. But, hey, it wasn't designed for that. No one design fits all possibilities, and this already seems to be doing a pretty nice job at several.

All this for under one hundred dollars!

Plywood $30. Lumber $20. Epoxy & glass $40. Paint or varnish $10.

Lumber could easily have cost but a quarter to half of the above. I used clear red oak before cutting the skegs away. Could easily have gotten by cheaper. Even the gunwales and thwarts could have been softwood. Of course this does not count the cost of the sail rig, canoe air bags, plans or any of the other things which always conspire to add to the cost of any project, but still, the completed project has to be near the least expensive end of the boating cost spectrum. Not "cheap". Not "disposable". Inexpensive, fun and easily built. When bigger and heavier boats are too much trouble of when winds are likely to be on the light side it is a great boat to have in the stable.

Can you tell that I like it?

 

*****

by Michael Storer, Designer

With this narrow prototype Paul sits low inside acting as ballast and is very ready to let the sail (sheet)ngo at the first sign of trouble. You could sit on the side if you were a confident sailor for probably more speed than many would want. The wider boat would also match the standard drop in sailing rig plan that Paul used for his canoe.

Paul's strategy of sitting on a bean bag for sailing is possibly quite relevant for sailing any of the Quick Canoes even if you do fit the seats for paddling.

The Quick Canoe 155, the standard design has 5" more beam than this skinny experimental boat. It is stable enough for a teenager to stand up in. I would probably recommend the bow end has the skeg/fin removed for sailing - it might have too much bite and tend to steer the boat in stronger winds. Also I would recommend largish buoyancy bags or tanks be fitted - there is some extra ply on the three sheets that would make modest tanks possible. On small lakes and rivers with warm water a ditching might not be too unpleasant, but bigger waterways and colder water could not only be unpleasant, but dangerous.

MIK


To comment on Duckworks articles, please visit our forum


  sails
  plans
  epoxy
  rope/line
  hardware
  canoe/Kayak
  sailmaking
  materials
  models
  media
  tools
  gear