| I am sure you will have heard of the “Peter Principle”, whereby 
      people in an organisation hold their current position by dint of their 
      performance in previous jobs, and so rise to the level of their 
      incompetence. MacPhail’s variant, derived from years experience of running 
      a chandlery, states that: 
      “Most people own a boat larger than they need or want”  Have I any evidence 
      for this? Well, the usage rates of non-racing craft - I deliberately omit 
      here the racing fraternity who often commit heavily to their boats both in 
      terms of time and money - are strikingly low. On an average weekend 
      between May and September - in the UK - some 3-5% of boats are away from 
      their moorings or marina berths according to informal soundings taken from 
      harbour masters and marina operators. Put the other way round, that’s 
      95-97% of boats unused, and that is a phenomenon which bears casual 
      confirmation. Now, call me naive, but I thought the point of owning a boat 
      for pleasure was to get onto the water, so unless a good many people revel 
      in the cachet of simply owning a boat, some thing is going slightly wrong 
      here.
 I cannot determine the reasons for lack of use from first 
      principles, but have to deduce them from those with whom I come into 
      contact. Roughly in order of precedence, they are as follows: 
        Lack of time - to afford to own and maintain such a fine craft, 
        one must have a pretty high-powered job. In these straightened times, 
        holding down said job is so time-consuming that there is little time, or 
        energy, left over for the boat.The family aren’t interested - “ I bought it because my 
        partner/family wanted a larger/more comfortable boat (but in fact it 
        turns out that they are not really interested after all)”. So finding 
        “quality time” for the family to assuage the guilt of spending yet more 
        money on your own interest reduces the time available for boating.Lack of crew (often a corollary of 2) - “I can never get a crew 
        together on a regular basis, at least not the sort of people who know 
        what they are doing”. I sometimes wonder whether crew are needed 
        primarily to help sail the boat, or more to boost the owner’s 
        confidence?Bigger is better - “I thought I ought to get a bigger boat so we 
        could go further afield”. At the risk of biting the hand that feeds me, 
        there does seem to be an inexorable pressure from peer groups, the 
        media, and a cultural notion of “progress” to go bigger, and hence 
        better all the time. In the context of boat ownership, it is often 
        self-defeating. Those with car-toppable or trailable boats routinely go 
        further afield than those with larger craft. Given the limited time 
        available to most of us, chartering is surely the better bet for 
        exploring new waters.The cost - “I’ll skip it this year because I can’t afford it just 
        now”  If you recognize any of 
      the above constraints, it may be time to re-evaluate your ownership of a 
      boat. Start by doing the thing you should never do for a leisure activity. 
      Add up the number of hours spent using your boat this last season on the 
      one hand, versus the expense (including depreciation and capital costs) 
      and hours spent on upkeep (costed at the same rate as your local yard, if 
      you are feeling brave) on the other. Does it make sense, either in 
      absolute terms, i.e. total amount of money or time, or as £/hour? What do 
      these figures represent in terms of weeks chartering, a family holiday, or 
      time spent doing other things? I have to say that the only groups of 
      people who add up the costs regularly are either professional boat users - 
      such as fishermen, charter operators and boatbuilders - or those who are 
      in a syndicate who need to reclaim their 1/2 or 2/3 or whatever from the 
      other owners. Us ordinary mortals usually don’t want to know, even though 
      the household and or car expenses may be scrutinised in detail.
 
 Enough cold calculation, let us now turn to address the issues in a 
      more positive way, by suggesting a few solutions: If you suffer from lack of time, perhaps the most obvious thing to do 
      is to make more time for boating. This is not quite as facile as it 
      sounds, since almost all of us are under pressure of time, doing more of 
      one activity necessarily displaces another to some extent. A theory I 
      heard propounded a few years ago was that we only have time for 2-1/2 
      activities, one of which is usually our job. That leaves 1-1/2 
      for all our other commitments. Is your boating a "1", a "1/2", or does it 
      vie with a host of other activities for the odd spare moments? Another 
      option is to make your existing boat easier to use by basing it closer to 
      home or at a marina, even if this does involve a trade-off of expense 
      versus time. Or you can base the existing boat in an area where shorter 
      trips are more readily available. This will almost certainly be more 
      expensive in absolute terms, but not necessarily in £/hours used. Perhaps 
      you can reduce the preparation time for going boating, by kitting the boat 
      out with enough food, water, fuel etc to enable you to go with minimum 
      delay should an unexpected opportunity arise. Finally, there is always the 
      option of selling the boat and chartering, or borrowing, when required, 
      thus freeing up the time spent on maintenance. If it is the case that your family are not quite so enthusiastic as 
      yourself, that often stems from a misconception of the dangers or 
      difficulty of boating. You stand a good chance of terminally discouraging 
      non-boating members of your family if: 
          the only worthwhile 
        outings are days long your time pressures are such that you have to go on specific days 
        or weekends, come what may merely getting to the boat is a significant evolution in its own 
        right you don’t involve them. For instance, the skipper does not always - 
        indeed should not always - need to be at the helm. I will not even 
        mention the relative merits of kitchens versus galleys! there is only one possible way of doing things. Much of the ink and 
        hot air devoted to “seamanship” could be saved if it were remembered 
        more often that the end - of delivering the boat and crew safely to 
        their destination without inconvenience to others - justifies any means 
        that work reliably. It is often hard to accept that other members of the family don’t share 
      your enthusiasm - I must make allowances for the fact that my wife 
      considers a bus timetable an essential piece of sailing equipment - but 
      set against that is the enormous appeal of “messing about in boats”. If 
      you are able at relatively short notice to take advantage of good 
      conditions to involve the family, and so slowly - it may take years - but 
      surely build the confidence, enjoyment and skills, you will have crew for 
      life. If you really are on your own, it is probably best to accept it. My 
      wife would rather go to ballet on her own than have me fidgeting in the 
      next seat trying to get enough light to do the crossword. Lack of crew is not an uncommon problem, usually most successfully 
      solved by sharing the ownership of the boat, or joining a club to get 
      readier access to a pool of skills. Another approach is to modify the boat 
      and/or mooring arrangements to allow easier single-handing Lastly, if the main problem is that the boat is simply too big or 
      expensive, then apart from sharing ownership, the answer is obvious! And 
      bear in mind that, as mentioned above, many people find it hard to get 
      skilled crew, so it is not usually too much of a problem getting sailing 
      even if you don’t have a boat 
 There is an approach that cuts across all these issues, and that is to 
      have a smaller boat - unless you are starting from a single-seater kayak 
      or windsurfer in which case there is really nowhere to go. Think of some 
      of the freedoms which a smaller boat can confer: 
        lower initial outlay, or higher quality for the same outlay, or, a 
        solution a number of people find rewarding, a “bespoke” boat for the 
        same outlay. There has perhaps never been as wide a choice of custom - 
        or semi-custom - built boats as there is now. Many are the sort of craft 
        which can give real pride of ownership. lower maintenance costs 
        - partly because you will need smaller quantities or sizes of items 
        which need replacing - i.e. rope, rigging, paint and so on. It may also 
        be that many of the maintenance tasks could now be done yourself, even 
        if time is shortlower storage costs - especially if the boat is car-toppable or 
        trailable since you might be able to be based at home, in which case 
        finding the time for maintenance becomes that much easierfewer things to maintain, so the boat tends to be easier to keep in 
        good shape, thus increasing seaworthiness and eventual re-sale valueshorter trips seem more adventurous in small boats , and you can 
        explore smaller creeks impossible for larger boats. Short trips are good 
        for involving the family - if you reckon on 15-20 minutes per year of 
        age maximum per trip for children, you stand a good chance of keeping 
        their interest and enthusiasm, even if you do lose them to the racing 
        circuit for a few years!finally, the consequences of a minor error of judgement such as 
        unscheduled contact, either with terra firma or someone else’s 
        belongings, are usually less serious in a smaller boat. Though I have now probably filled my postbag with indignant letters, I 
      contend that a smaller boat is more used, more fun, less onerous and may 
      leave you with both the enthusiasm and enough change to charter a larger 
      boat for more ambitious outings. Even Herreshof agrees: “It is my opinion that the double-paddle canoe gives the most fun for 
      the money of any type of boat a person can possess, and I must say that it 
      is my favorite form of aquatic sport.” You don’t have to settle for a canoe, but mull it over. One of the 
      purposes of running a business like
      Classic Marine is to help 
      more people own a boat which suits their real needs, looks good, and which 
      works well. Most importantly, it should provide the fun that is at the 
      heart of owning your own boat. For a new look at traditional yacht fittingswww.classicmarine.co.uk
 
 |